Skip to main content

Mark A. Wolgin, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon

Specialist (Fellowship Trained) in Spinal and Foot/Ankle Surgery, Albany, GA, Office Phone 229-883-4707

Home
About Me
Spine Anatomy
Spine Disorders
Non Surgical Treatments
Surgical Treatments
Anter Cerv Discect & Fus
Anter Lumbar Fusion
Cervical Disc Replacement
Coflex Interlam Device
Direct Lateral Fusion
Foraminotomy
InterSpinous Proc Device
Kyphoplasty
Laminectomy
Laminectomy/Spondylolysis
Laminoplasty
LumboSacral Fus: AxiaLIF
Microdecompression
Microdiscectomy
Minimally Invasive Surg
Min Invasive Lumbar Fusio
Min Invasive Fusion pg 2
Min Invasive Fusion pg 3
Min Invasive case example
Posterior Lumbar Fusion
Risks of Surgery
Spinous Process Clamp
Pain Management
Foot/Ankle
General Orthopaedics
Smoking
Weight Loss
Frequently Asked Question
Patient Forms
Testimonials
Medical Economics
Insurance Denials
Contact Info
Site Map
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion
Case Examples
 
 
 
Patient is 52 yr. old male with chronic severe low back pain that has failed to respond to conservative (non-operative treatment), including medications, therapy, and injections.
 
 
 
On the lateral (side) view of the pre-op MRI, note the normal appearing discs between L1 and L4, marked with white asterisk.  The discs between L4 and S1, marked by the dark arrowhead, are not normal appearing.  While the disc at L5-S1 is clearly flattened, the disc at L4-5 has a bulge at the back and does not have the same white signal as the normal discs above.
 
The decision was made to include the L4-5 disc in the fusion since, after fusing L5-S1, the stress would be concentrated on the next level, which in this case, already shows signs of wear and tear.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One month after surgery, the interbody spacers, which are invisible to xray except for the metal markers in them, can be seen in the interspaces between the vertebral bodies.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The patient's back pain was significantly better by about 6 weeks.
 
Seven months after surgery, the patient is feeling much better.  On the lateral (side) view, some calcification (whiteness) can be seen in the interspaces.  This finding, however, is subtle.
 
 
 
 
By checking the patient with a CT scan, however, the bony healing between the vertebral bodies can be demonstrated on the reconstructed views.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The patient was released to his regular duty at 8 months post op.  However, since he has two less discs in his spine (four discs doing the job of six), he is still advised to avoid frequent bending, lifting, and twisting. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On the lateral X-ray at one year post op, more calcification can be seen between the vertebral bodies as indicated by the asterisk. 
 
The patient continues to do well.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Here's another example of a patient who at one year after a two level fusion had a solid bony connection.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
But fusion doesn't occur in every case.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On those occasions where a fusion does not fuse, the screws will eventually become loose.  In the Xray below, you can see that the two lowest screws have a dark line around them that is referred to as a "halo."  Although the screw will have a good bite (or purchase) on the bone when it is initially placed, when it gets loose, it will to a small degree compress the bone around the screw.  This absence of bone, since bone with its calcium looks white on xray, has the appearance of a dark line around the screw.  In the xray below, the screws above, which are not loose, do not have the same halo.
 
 
 
 
 
This image below from a CT scan, taken from a different patient, shows the xray appearance of screws when they become loose. 
 
This loosening is demonstrated by the dark line around the screws (referred to as a "halo"), which indicate that the screw threads have no purchase or bite into the bone.
 
Keep in mind that the purpose of the screws is to hold the bones in place until the healing (fusion) occurs, and that even in the best circumstances, the fusion rate in the lumbar region in large groups of patients is somewhere between 80-90%.
 
However, not every patient with a CT scan like this requires revision surgery:  each case is considered individually.
 
 
 
 
 
Here is a case where extra bone grew near and in the foramen, which is the hole through which the nerve root exits the spinal column.  In this case, although the patient might be expected to have pain along the area supplied by the involved nerve root, the patient had no symptoms.  This case also illustrated why the focus is on treating the patient, not the x-ray.